Comments on: What (2006), Why (2007), now How (2009) for Enterprise 2.0 http://itsinsider.com/2009/06/30/what-2006-why-2007-now-how-2009-for-enterprise-20/ An Insider's view on IT-Social for the Enterprise Sat, 28 Apr 2012 19:44:07 +0000 hourly 1 By: links for 2009-07-01 | burningCat http://itsinsider.com/2009/06/30/what-2006-why-2007-now-how-2009-for-enterprise-20/#comment-734 links for 2009-07-01 | burningCat Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:07:20 +0000 http://itsinsider.com/?p=795#comment-734 [...] What (2006), Why (2007), now How (2009) for Enterprise 2.0 [...] [...] What (2006), Why (2007), now How (2009) for Enterprise 2.0 [...]

]]> By: Paula Thrasher http://itsinsider.com/2009/06/30/what-2006-why-2007-now-how-2009-for-enterprise-20/#comment-730 Paula Thrasher Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:38:27 +0000 http://itsinsider.com/?p=795#comment-730 Susan - I could not agree more that the unconference meetings were some of the best sessions from the conference. I think another big theme is that we've moved from the emergent, bootstrap-your-way model to getting top-down support and actual budgets. But with that comes politics, culture, process, and a host of other challenges. I think the issues of ROI and Adoption are a good sign that the ideals of Enterprise 2.0 is finally registering at the top of organizations. Maybe in two or three years we'll even be talking about our legacy Enterprise 2.0 systems? Susan – I could not agree more that the unconference meetings were some of the best sessions from the conference.

I think another big theme is that we’ve moved from the emergent, bootstrap-your-way model to getting top-down support and actual budgets. But with that comes politics, culture, process, and a host of other challenges. I think the issues of ROI and Adoption are a good sign that the ideals of Enterprise 2.0 is finally registering at the top of organizations. Maybe in two or three years we’ll even be talking about our legacy Enterprise 2.0 systems?

]]>