<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Checkmate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsinsider.com/2009/11/05/checkmate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsinsider.com/2009/11/05/checkmate/</link>
	<description>An Insider&#039;s view on IT-Social for the Enterprise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 19:44:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Social Software 2.0: Enterprise Process Ubiquity &#124; CloudAve</title>
		<link>http://itsinsider.com/2009/11/05/checkmate/#comment-5253</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Software 2.0: Enterprise Process Ubiquity &#124; CloudAve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 05:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsinsider.com/?p=936#comment-5253</guid>
		<description>[...] Social Software 1.0 is the “Tools Era”. Put these collaboration and information sharing tools in place, then let the benefits flow. And the benefits do flow. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social Software 1.0 is the “Tools Era”. Put these collaboration and information sharing tools in place, then let the benefits flow. And the benefits do flow. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frogpond &#187; Looking back at the E20SUMMIT &#8211; part 4: selected learnings</title>
		<link>http://itsinsider.com/2009/11/05/checkmate/#comment-5252</link>
		<dc:creator>frogpond &#187; Looking back at the E20SUMMIT &#8211; part 4: selected learnings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsinsider.com/?p=936#comment-5252</guid>
		<description>[...] course there&#8217;s a place and rationale for Enterprise 2.0, and the many case studies provide ample support. Yet, we shouldn&#8217;t stop there and assume that uptake will happen naturally. It won&#8217;t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course there&#8217;s a place and rationale for Enterprise 2.0, and the many case studies provide ample support. Yet, we shouldn&#8217;t stop there and assume that uptake will happen naturally. It won&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yet Another Versioning Scheme: Social Software 2.0 &#171; The SiliconANGLE</title>
		<link>http://itsinsider.com/2009/11/05/checkmate/#comment-5246</link>
		<dc:creator>Yet Another Versioning Scheme: Social Software 2.0 &#171; The SiliconANGLE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsinsider.com/?p=936#comment-5246</guid>
		<description>[...] Social Software 1.0 is the “Tools Era”. Put these collaboration and information sharing tools in place, then let the benefits flow. And the benefits do flow. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social Software 1.0 is the “Tools Era”. Put these collaboration and information sharing tools in place, then let the benefits flow. And the benefits do flow. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Software 2.0: Enterprise Process Ubiquity &#171; I&#8217;m Not Actually a Geek</title>
		<link>http://itsinsider.com/2009/11/05/checkmate/#comment-5244</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Software 2.0: Enterprise Process Ubiquity &#171; I&#8217;m Not Actually a Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsinsider.com/?p=936#comment-5244</guid>
		<description>[...] Social Software 1.0 is the &#8220;Tools Era&#8221;. Put these collaboration and information sharing tools in place, then let the benefits flow. And the benefits do flow. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social Software 1.0 is the &#8220;Tools Era&#8221;. Put these collaboration and information sharing tools in place, then let the benefits flow. And the benefits do flow. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Process Barfs on Social</title>
		<link>http://itsinsider.com/2009/11/05/checkmate/#comment-5243</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Process Barfs on Social</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsinsider.com/?p=936#comment-5243</guid>
		<description>[...] an industry, but it is a model where some great franchises can be built.  So we have some great Social Case Studies available today.  The scalable model comes when somebody starts to bottle the magic that was done [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an industry, but it is a model where some great franchises can be built.  So we have some great Social Case Studies available today.  The scalable model comes when somebody starts to bottle the magic that was done [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Process Barfs on Social &#171; SmoothSpan Blog</title>
		<link>http://itsinsider.com/2009/11/05/checkmate/#comment-5242</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Process Barfs on Social &#171; SmoothSpan Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsinsider.com/?p=936#comment-5242</guid>
		<description>[...] an industry, but it is a model where some great franchises can be built.  So we have some great Social Case Studies available today.  The scalable model comes when somebody starts to bottle the magic that was done [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an industry, but it is a model where some great franchises can be built.  So we have some great Social Case Studies available today.  The scalable model comes when somebody starts to bottle the magic that was done [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: השיטוטים של השבוע: 1 לנובמבר – 7 לנובמבר 2009 : ארבעה כיווני מידע</title>
		<link>http://itsinsider.com/2009/11/05/checkmate/#comment-5241</link>
		<dc:creator>השיטוטים של השבוע: 1 לנובמבר – 7 לנובמבר 2009 : ארבעה כיווני מידע</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsinsider.com/?p=936#comment-5241</guid>
		<description>[...] האם ניתן כבר לשפוט את הכישלון (או הצלחה) של המדיה החברתית בארגונים: גיל יהודה מתייחס למאמר שפורסם ב- InfoWorld ומציג 6 יישומים, ביניהם מדיה חברתית, שלדעת המחבר נכשלו: IT snake oil: Six tech cure-alls that went bunk. התגובה של גיל: A critique that missed the mark. באותו הקשר (האם מדיה חברתית בארגונים מצליחה או לא) מפרסמת Susan Scrupski רשימה ארוכה של ארגונים שמשתמשים בכלים אלו: Checkmate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] האם ניתן כבר לשפוט את הכישלון (או הצלחה) של המדיה החברתית בארגונים: גיל יהודה מתייחס למאמר שפורסם ב- InfoWorld ומציג 6 יישומים, ביניהם מדיה חברתית, שלדעת המחבר נכשלו: IT snake oil: Six tech cure-alls that went bunk. התגובה של גיל: A critique that missed the mark. באותו הקשר (האם מדיה חברתית בארגונים מצליחה או לא) מפרסמת Susan Scrupski רשימה ארוכה של ארגונים שמשתמשים בכלים אלו: Checkmate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E 2.0 &#8211; Not Joining the Debate, But&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://itsinsider.com/2009/11/05/checkmate/#comment-5240</link>
		<dc:creator>E 2.0 &#8211; Not Joining the Debate, But&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itsinsider.com/?p=936#comment-5240</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8216;diplomatic&#8217; I&#8217;m not going to step into the debate featuring Dennis, Susan, Nenshad and others&#8230; but I&#8217;ve been waiting and waiting for one benefit to be touted, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8216;diplomatic&#8217; I&#8217;m not going to step into the debate featuring Dennis, Susan, Nenshad and others&#8230; but I&#8217;ve been waiting and waiting for one benefit to be touted, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

